<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Eye on things</title> <atom:link href="http://www.littletimemachine.com/gallery/2007/01/eye-on-things/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.littletimemachine.com/gallery/2007/01/eye-on-things/</link> <description>Photography from Liverpool and beyond</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:23:08 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Adam</title><link>http://www.littletimemachine.com/gallery/2007/01/eye-on-things/comment-page-1/#comment-4589</link> <dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:22:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">/gallery/2007/01/eye-on-things/#comment-4589</guid> <description>I like this, but find the top eyelashes distracting due to the limited DOF.  Could your model rotate backwards a bit (or reposition your camera) so that both top and bottom eyelashes are equally in focus (or out of focus)?  Perhaps have the eye open a little wider?You say that the nifty hunts a lot - would it not be easier to focus manually and move the camera/model back and forwards very slowly?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this, but find the top eyelashes distracting due to the limited DOF.  Could your model rotate backwards a bit (or reposition your camera) so that both top and bottom eyelashes are equally in focus (or out of focus)?  Perhaps have the eye open a little wider?</p><p>You say that the nifty hunts a lot &#8211; would it not be easier to focus manually and move the camera/model back and forwards very slowly?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dave Griffiths</title><link>http://www.littletimemachine.com/gallery/2007/01/eye-on-things/comment-page-1/#comment-4588</link> <dc:creator>Dave Griffiths</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:41:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">/gallery/2007/01/eye-on-things/#comment-4588</guid> <description>Awesome pic, I&#039;ve now ordered a Canon 50mm f/1.8 lens and will try to take a similar shot. Not heard much about extension tubes, are they worth the cash?ThanksGriffy (from OCuk forums)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome pic, I&#8217;ve now ordered a Canon 50mm f/1.8 lens and will try to take a similar shot. Not heard much about extension tubes, are they worth the cash?</p><p>Thanks</p><p>Griffy (from OCuk forums)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 5/12 queries in 0.094 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.vanilladays.com @ 2012-02-11 23:19:14 -->
