<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Anglican Cathedral</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vanilladays.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vanilladays.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/</link>
	<description>Daily photography from Liverpool and beyond</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DedicatedRR</title>
		<link>http://www.vanilladays.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/#comment-17646</link>
		<dc:creator>DedicatedRR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanilladays.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/#comment-17646</guid>
		<description>I like everything about this one, the perspective, the tones. It gives the church a very good sense of character, like it's alive...if that makes much sense. ^^;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like everything about this one, the perspective, the tones. It gives the church a very good sense of character, like it&#8217;s alive&#8230;if that makes much sense. ^^;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kitten</title>
		<link>http://www.vanilladays.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/#comment-17429</link>
		<dc:creator>kitten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanilladays.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/#comment-17429</guid>
		<description>I think including the railings to the right gives you a real perspective of just how enormous that building is. Otherwise you'd have little frame of reference. It instantly shows you the size in comparison to the environmental factors around it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think including the railings to the right gives you a real perspective of just how enormous that building is. Otherwise you&#8217;d have little frame of reference. It instantly shows you the size in comparison to the environmental factors around it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yiannis krikis</title>
		<link>http://www.vanilladays.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/#comment-17093</link>
		<dc:creator>yiannis krikis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 11:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanilladays.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/#comment-17093</guid>
		<description>excellent use of perspective and great tones - the sky is perfect</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>excellent use of perspective and great tones - the sky is perfect</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.vanilladays.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/#comment-17092</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 09:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanilladays.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/#comment-17092</guid>
		<description>I'm of the opinion that it hasn't worked either Pete, for two reasons:

The angle of the cathedral is wrong in that it's too front-heavy without showing just how deep the building is.

Secondly, you've pushed the building over to the left (in order to get the railings in?) and I don't feel there's a balance there.

B&#38;W HDR works very well though :)

Happy New Year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m of the opinion that it hasn&#8217;t worked either Pete, for two reasons:</p>
<p>The angle of the cathedral is wrong in that it&#8217;s too front-heavy without showing just how deep the building is.</p>
<p>Secondly, you&#8217;ve pushed the building over to the left (in order to get the railings in?) and I don&#8217;t feel there&#8217;s a balance there.</p>
<p>B&amp;W HDR works very well though :)</p>
<p>Happy New Year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.vanilladays.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/#comment-17059</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 09:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanilladays.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/#comment-17059</guid>
		<description>a very impressive building - well captured in your image :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a very impressive building - well captured in your image :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ste</title>
		<link>http://www.vanilladays.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/#comment-17046</link>
		<dc:creator>Ste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 15:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanilladays.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/#comment-17046</guid>
		<description>Looks good to me Pete. I know a few people who might have tried to correct the converging verticals (I know someone who hated them so much that he recent bought a Canon Tilt and Shift lens!), but I like the perspective of this shot as it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks good to me Pete. I know a few people who might have tried to correct the converging verticals (I know someone who hated them so much that he recent bought a Canon Tilt and Shift lens!), but I like the perspective of this shot as it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian McEwen</title>
		<link>http://www.vanilladays.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/#comment-17045</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian McEwen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanilladays.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/#comment-17045</guid>
		<description>"I’m not 100% sure on this one."

No, I think you're right, it &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; the Anglican Cathedral ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’m not 100% sure on this one.&#8221;</p>
<p>No, I think you&#8217;re right, it <em>is</em> the Anglican Cathedral ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.vanilladays.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/#comment-17042</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 12:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanilladays.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/#comment-17042</guid>
		<description>I think maybe the walls of the cathedral are too light. The real thing is a deep red sandstone but from this you may think its a much lighter stoneface.
I do like this angle and the sky though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think maybe the walls of the cathedral are too light. The real thing is a deep red sandstone but from this you may think its a much lighter stoneface.<br />
I do like this angle and the sky though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
