<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The Anglican Cathedral</title> <atom:link href="http://www.littletimemachine.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.littletimemachine.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/</link> <description>Photography from Liverpool and beyond</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:23:08 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: DedicatedRR</title><link>http://www.littletimemachine.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/comment-page-1/#comment-17646</link> <dc:creator>DedicatedRR</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:47:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanilladays.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/#comment-17646</guid> <description>I like everything about this one, the perspective, the tones. It gives the church a very good sense of character, like it&#039;s alive...if that makes much sense. ^^;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like everything about this one, the perspective, the tones. It gives the church a very good sense of character, like it&#8217;s alive&#8230;if that makes much sense. ^^;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kitten</title><link>http://www.littletimemachine.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/comment-page-1/#comment-17429</link> <dc:creator>kitten</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:48:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanilladays.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/#comment-17429</guid> <description>I think including the railings to the right gives you a real perspective of just how enormous that building is. Otherwise you&#039;d have little frame of reference. It instantly shows you the size in comparison to the environmental factors around it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think including the railings to the right gives you a real perspective of just how enormous that building is. Otherwise you&#8217;d have little frame of reference. It instantly shows you the size in comparison to the environmental factors around it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: yiannis krikis</title><link>http://www.littletimemachine.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/comment-page-1/#comment-17093</link> <dc:creator>yiannis krikis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 11:41:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanilladays.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/#comment-17093</guid> <description>excellent use of perspective and great tones - the sky is perfect</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>excellent use of perspective and great tones &#8211; the sky is perfect</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andy</title><link>http://www.littletimemachine.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/comment-page-1/#comment-17092</link> <dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 09:23:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanilladays.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/#comment-17092</guid> <description>I&#039;m of the opinion that it hasn&#039;t worked either Pete, for two reasons:The angle of the cathedral is wrong in that it&#039;s too front-heavy without showing just how deep the building is.Secondly, you&#039;ve pushed the building over to the left (in order to get the railings in?) and I don&#039;t feel there&#039;s a balance there.B&amp;W HDR works very well though :)Happy New Year!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m of the opinion that it hasn&#8217;t worked either Pete, for two reasons:</p><p>The angle of the cathedral is wrong in that it&#8217;s too front-heavy without showing just how deep the building is.</p><p>Secondly, you&#8217;ve pushed the building over to the left (in order to get the railings in?) and I don&#8217;t feel there&#8217;s a balance there.</p><p>B&amp;W HDR works very well though :)</p><p>Happy New Year!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: dave</title><link>http://www.littletimemachine.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/comment-page-1/#comment-17059</link> <dc:creator>dave</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 09:24:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanilladays.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/#comment-17059</guid> <description>a very impressive building - well captured in your image :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a very impressive building &#8211; well captured in your image :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ste</title><link>http://www.littletimemachine.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/comment-page-1/#comment-17046</link> <dc:creator>Ste</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 15:36:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanilladays.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/#comment-17046</guid> <description>Looks good to me Pete. I know a few people who might have tried to correct the converging verticals (I know someone who hated them so much that he recent bought a Canon Tilt and Shift lens!), but I like the perspective of this shot as it is.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks good to me Pete. I know a few people who might have tried to correct the converging verticals (I know someone who hated them so much that he recent bought a Canon Tilt and Shift lens!), but I like the perspective of this shot as it is.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adrian McEwen</title><link>http://www.littletimemachine.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/comment-page-1/#comment-17045</link> <dc:creator>Adrian McEwen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:42:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanilladays.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/#comment-17045</guid> <description>&quot;I’m not 100% sure on this one.&quot;No, I think you&#039;re right, it &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; the Anglican Cathedral ;-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’m not 100% sure on this one.&#8221;</p><p>No, I think you&#8217;re right, it <em>is</em> the Anglican Cathedral ;-)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ian Jackson</title><link>http://www.littletimemachine.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/comment-page-1/#comment-17042</link> <dc:creator>Ian Jackson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 12:37:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanilladays.com/gallery/2008/01/the_anglican_cathedral/#comment-17042</guid> <description>I think maybe the walls of the cathedral are too light. The real thing is a deep red sandstone but from this you may think its a much lighter stoneface.
I do like this angle and the sky though.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think maybe the walls of the cathedral are too light. The real thing is a deep red sandstone but from this you may think its a much lighter stoneface.<br
/> I do like this angle and the sky though.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 5/18 queries in 0.148 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.vanilladays.com @ 2012-02-12 07:24:49 -->
