<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Liverpool Transition III</title> <atom:link href="http://www.littletimemachine.com/gallery/2009/01/liverpool_transition_iii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.littletimemachine.com/gallery/2009/01/liverpool_transition_iii/</link> <description>Photography from Liverpool and beyond</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:23:08 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: LightningPaul</title><link>http://www.littletimemachine.com/gallery/2009/01/liverpool_transition_iii/comment-page-1/#comment-26469</link> <dc:creator>LightningPaul</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:39:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanilladays.com/?p=2940#comment-26469</guid> <description>Great surprise shot!
For the noise: I&#039;m playing with Noise Ninja, the results are pretty amazing.
I tested it for instance on a picture shot with ISO800, two stops underexposed, RAW, D200 camera. First I pushed the exposure two stops up in Nikon View NX, which was got well exposed but as grainy as your image. After that I applied twice Noise Ninja. The result is a softer image without almost any noise.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great surprise shot!<br
/> For the noise: I&#8217;m playing with Noise Ninja, the results are pretty amazing.<br
/> I tested it for instance on a picture shot with ISO800, two stops underexposed, RAW, D200 camera. First I pushed the exposure two stops up in Nikon View NX, which was got well exposed but as grainy as your image. After that I applied twice Noise Ninja. The result is a softer image without almost any noise.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ben</title><link>http://www.littletimemachine.com/gallery/2009/01/liverpool_transition_iii/comment-page-1/#comment-26464</link> <dc:creator>ben</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanilladays.com/?p=2940#comment-26464</guid> <description>I think it&#039;s a nice image. It&#039;s as noisy as hell, but jesus, ISO 10k, amazing.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a nice image. It&#8217;s as noisy as hell, but jesus, ISO 10k, amazing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Laurie</title><link>http://www.littletimemachine.com/gallery/2009/01/liverpool_transition_iii/comment-page-1/#comment-26462</link> <dc:creator>Laurie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:59:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanilladays.com/?p=2940#comment-26462</guid> <description>I have not pushed my D700 to ISO 10,000 yet.  It is amazing that this is such a usable image.  Love the light here.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not pushed my D700 to ISO 10,000 yet.  It is amazing that this is such a usable image.  Love the light here.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark</title><link>http://www.littletimemachine.com/gallery/2009/01/liverpool_transition_iii/comment-page-1/#comment-26461</link> <dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:11:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanilladays.com/?p=2940#comment-26461</guid> <description>Nice shot. Good choice using the ambient;  flash would&#039;ve killed the atmosphere. Personally I like the DoF f2.8 gives here, but I reckon a tighter, flatter crop would improve the image.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice shot. Good choice using the ambient;  flash would&#8217;ve killed the atmosphere. Personally I like the DoF f2.8 gives here, but I reckon a tighter, flatter crop would improve the image.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Simon</title><link>http://www.littletimemachine.com/gallery/2009/01/liverpool_transition_iii/comment-page-1/#comment-26459</link> <dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 07:32:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanilladays.com/?p=2940#comment-26459</guid> <description>Even the noise looks great on the D700...much more like film grain. I did the same as you last week and traded my Canon gear in for a D700, 24-70mm and a Sigma 50 f1.4. Wow, what a camera! Thanks for helping to push me over the edge with your night shots.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even the noise looks great on the D700&#8230;much more like film grain. I did the same as you last week and traded my Canon gear in for a D700, 24-70mm and a Sigma 50 f1.4. Wow, what a camera! Thanks for helping to push me over the edge with your night shots.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 5/15 queries in 0.068 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.vanilladays.com @ 2012-02-12 07:59:06 -->
